Hᴀʀʀɪs Fᴀᴜʟᴋɴᴇʀ: If the teacher had been a man, and one of your daughters had this happen to them—
Tᴜᴄᴋᴇʀ Cᴀʀʟsᴏɴ (cuts her off): Well I’d shoot him. […] Because boys and girls are different. […] The difference is they’re girls and girls react differently to this kind of thing.1
For here again we come within range of that very interesting and obscure masculine complex which has had so much influence upon the woman’s movement; that deep-seated desire, not so much that she shall be inferior as that he shall be superior[.]
—Virginia Woolf2
I know how to stand up to a man, who’s unfairly trespassing against me. […] Like, if we move beyond the boundaries of civil discourse, we know what the next step is. Ok, that’s forbidden in discourse with women. And so, I don’t think that men can control crazy women.
—Jordan Peterson3
Iɴ ᴏᴜʀ ʟᴀsᴛ ᴘᴏsᴛ, we identified at least a political double standard in the public’s response to Milo Yiannopoulos’s hemi-Hellenical howler. He got shitcanned over edgy remarks about underage sexploits which, mutatis mutandis, yeasty radfems like Eve Ensler or Lena Dunham have made with impunity; at bottom, his crime seems to have been, “talking in public while being conservative.”4 After all, elderly faggot shitlib George Takei has waxed nostalgic about his own skeevy first sexual experience at thirteen-going-on-sixteen5 with a “golden Greek god”6 of a camp counselor, over and over and over again,7 without penalty.
Of course, looking more closely, there is another double standard in play, one which quietly undergirds many of America’s prevailing sexual assumptions, whether Left or Right. Namely,— Ah, but here we get ahead of ourselves. Let us start over.
In this miniseries, “Hot For Teacher,” we’re briefly discussing the thorny issue of “cross-generational relationships,”8 or rather, what others have said about them. It’s an essential stop along the Yiannopoulevard towards understanding MILO’s big ex-gay makeover.9
Because we’re fags (like he was), our readers might not believe we can approach the issue of “cross-generational relationships” in good faith. We must remember, on the podcast which lost him three jobs10 Yiannopalaverous audibly said “the [Age of Consent] law[s are] probably about right; that’s probably roughly the right age,”11 and these clear words were still taken by the moralizers as sinister, weaselly hedges. So even if it’s a necessary part of our project, we should take the L from MILO and let dead dogs lie!
Fortunately, real men, righteous men—or at least heterosexual men—have descanted on our subject without cancellation. And so, it is with grateful hearts that we lowly, porn-addicted cocksuckers can defer to their superior judgment.
For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.12 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. (Isaiah 55:8-9 KJV)
One such sterling paragon of higher manhood is none other than Bill Maher, who has an enviable record of womanizing unblemished by commitment or other gay stuff. When “Two-Faces-Both-Foreheads” Maher isn’t coddling the Dangerous Fagomaniac with oozy insincerities,13 or taking full credit for Yiannopigeon’s downfall,14 you can find Ann Coulter’s ex-boy toy in the media, somewhere, blowing the lid off a double standard,—the very same double standard, that is, which we bubonic poofters rely on men like him to uncover and resolve.
We may find our exemplar, for instance, in a 2007 interview for Playboy, applying his sexually normal jurisprudence to the headlines about Debra Lafave,—a Florida teacher who, at the age of twenty-five, carried on an extramarital affair with a male student, age fourteen. To this barrel-chested, swashbuckling Maher snorted virilely, “I think it’s a little offbeat, but you know, I believe in the double standard.”15 Oh? Well, perhaps Maher is simply being edgy here, as is his cheeky wont! We’ll read on:
If a 28-year-old male teacher is screwing a 13-year-old girl, that’s a crime. But with Debra Lafave screwing her 14-year-old boy student, the crime is that we didn’t get it on videotape. Was he being taken advantage of? I wish I had been taken advantage of like that. What a memory she gave him. I would think he’s a champion among his friends. Are you kidding? Even with Michael Jackson —.16
Perhaps it’s our female-brained feebleness talking, but did Maher claim that the only crime in this case was that child pornography was not produced?
Like Dunham, Ensler, Takei and other lascivious blabs, Maher is a Lefty. And you may think that’s the sole reason his words,—“I wish I had been taken advantage of like that,”—didn’t get interpreted as an endorsement of pedophilia and sink his career.17 You have already observed perhaps that,—just as there exists a double standard which, particularly in all matters of sex, indemnifies Liberal misbehavior and skewers Conservative misbehavior,18—there is a double standard that forgives women and penalizes men for the same wrongdoings.
Speaking of, there are a couple of epilogical details about Lafave’s case worth mentioning before we gloss more hilarious quotes from The Maher Bathroom Reader. Lafave was alleged to have offended with the same boy in two different Florida counties, Hillsborough and Marion; she plead guilty and received a heccin’ slap on the wristerino the court in Hillsborough.
In a deal that includes three years of house arrest and seven years of sex-offender probation - a deal that has people across the country questioning whether a man would have received similar treatment - Lafave pleaded guilty Tuesday morning to two charges of lewd and lascivious battery. The plea also resolves the Marion County charges.19
However, the Marion County judge rejected the deal and, in fact, insisted she serve prison time for her crime.20 Additionally, the victim’s mother did not want her son to testify in court.21 Marion County prosecutors had no other choice than to drop all charges.22 It was a difficult decision, but the right one.23 To quote her male24 attorney,
To place Debbie into a Florida state women's penitentiary, to place an attractive young woman in that kind of hellhole, is like putting a piece of raw meat in with the lions.25
Justice is blind, indeed.
And neither is gynopiper Maher who, in ’98, on his show Politically Incorrect (prior to Real Tired or Club Boredom),26 sentimentally defended one Mary Kay Letourneau from a whole panel of special guest naysayers (which even included a disgusted Henry “Rock-n’-Roll Status Quo” Rollins). After he gloated over Yiannopoulos’s cancellation, folks at both The Hollyweird Reporter27 and The Washington Compost wanted to remind Maher of the clip.
For those who may not remember, Letourneau was a 34-year-old Seattle teacher who had an ongoing sexual relationship with a student [beginning] when he was 12 years old. She also gave birth to two of his children, one of them while incarcerated. After spending several years in prison, she married the student.
In the clip [from his 90’s TV spot], Maher said Letourneau was in jail “for being in love.”28
Here we have another female teacher who, like Lafave, engaged in an extramarital affair with an underage male student. (Unlike Lafave, she did not get off easy, although that’s only because Letourneau reoffended after walking free the first time.)29 And here, too, we have another boy—who could’ve been MILO30—mixed up in a sexual relationship with an adult.31 But the real victim in this cluster, or so Maher wants to persuade us, was Letourneau and not the clueless shaver whom she, a grown woman, steamrolled into teenaged fatherhood. No, that’s what Maher calls “love.”
He continued, “I admit that it’s unorthodox. She’s 35, the boy is 14. He was younger when they started. But she is pregnant again. That was the story this week. This is the second child by this boy. They are keeping the mother in jail32 because she won’t conform to what society feels should be the perfect American family.”3334
Later in the clip, when [a panelist] called the act rape, Maher responded, “How can a woman rape a man?”35
“You can’t rape the willing” in other words. Given that sexual abuse of men by women is comedy gold, there must be something laughable about men who are unwilling (whether because of reluctance, cowardice, embarrasment, impotence, homosexuality or another dysfunction).
Bull Manure’s one-liner—“how can a woman rape a man?”—comes off a little slippery. When discussing statutory rape, he calls the same fourteen-year-old a “boy” in one breath and then a “man” in another; but we should remember, his programs are very, very, very long36 and not even Maher himself is listening to what he’s saying. Let us remember also that sexual congress with a fully-grown woman may be considered sufficient experience to make a boy a man, that is, in the eyes of other men.
Moreover, “how can a woman rape a man?” is a legitimate and forward-thinking question, particularly back in 1998,—the same year that Good Vibrations released its life-changing sex guide Bend Over Boyfriend on VHS, stretching out to the nation’s girlfriends the as yet unplumbed pleasures of pegging.37 Federally speaking, American men simply weren’t be raped until 2012,38 when the FBI, which is an integral part of the Department of Justice, expanded its definition of rape to include male victims.39
Even we pillow-biters know that men and women, boys and girls, aren’t interchangeable. Credible heterosexual and conservative’s conservative, Sir Roger Scruton40 writes on their differences expertly in his manual for incels, Sexual Desire (2006). “The man is active in the pursuit of women[,]” he writes;
[the man] does not confine his attentions to one woman only, but moves on restlessly after new conquests, and attempts to exclude other men from enjoying their favours.41
Whereas “the woman,” on the other hand,
is not active in the pursuit of men, but modest and retiring. She thereby guarantees that she can be obtained only at the cost of effort and determination, and so ensures that her genes will unite with the strongest available strain, thus furthering their chances of survival.42
In which case, a woman who throws herself at a teenage boy has made a suboptimal choice. That said, don’t take our gay word for it.— New York Magazine ran a tally on “Dirty Old Women”43 and quoted an interview with Lavafe’s then befuddled hubby.
“If Debra had had an affair with a man who was richer than me, or more successful, that I could have understood,” as Debra Lafave’s estranged husband, Owen, put it. “But this was a boy. What could he offer her that I couldn’t?”44
Lucky for us, NY Mag has a good speculation as to what teenage boys offer their mommy gfs.
Power, for one thing. Compared with a teenage boy, a woman will almost always make more money. She will always know more about sex. She will generally be more competent and experienced and more able to assert her will on him than vice versa.45
Why, taking a young lover-boy is (for women) the feminist choice! Today’s empowered dame takes a lover green enough for her to dazzle, impress and titillate with minimal effort; one unprofessional enough, too, that she can keep him bound to her financially.
Naturally, the case of wives and mothers pulling schoolboys into their cars for clandestine quickies is an extreme example of this dating strategy. Our source defers to a female46 psychologist to describe a motivation for these “unorthodox” relationships.
Sometimes, the woman is not much older psychologically than the boy is in her developmental stage, […] So she’s having sex with a 14-year-old, and in her head, she’s 14, too. She’s getting the attention she never got.47
But what if she’s thirty- or forty-something, mind and body, and having sex with a man who’s, say, eight-years-old in his head? How does that sound?— We look now to two movie reviewers, Joe Rogan and Gavin McInnes (both very heterosexual men with wives and children) to tell us why that scenario flies.
MᴄIɴɴᴇs: I was watching Big [1988] with the kids the other day. Tom Hanks is, what? Eight in that movie? Nine? And then that woman seduces him and, I guess, he fucks her—he gets a boner? (Rᴏɢᴀɴ breaks out laughing.) And I’m like, you’re raping a child!
Rᴏɢᴀɴ (choking back giggles and grinning): Exactly!
MᴄIɴɴᴇs: Why are we watching this?
Rᴏɢᴀɴ: But she’s hot—she’s hot—and he looks like a man, so fuckin’ let it ride.48
If she’s hot and he looks like a man, fuckin’ let it ride.— That is the advice our superiors in sexual mores have for us. And on further inspection, there’s a ring of truth to the situation. Whether he’s eight, eighteen, or eighty, the average male doesn’t mature, inside, all that much.
One wonders what these garrulous, red-blooded comedians would think—if they could think—about a converse situation, as portrayed in Terry Gilliam’s Tideland (2005); in which Jeliza-Rose (Jodelle Ferland), age nine, shares on-screen kisses with a significantly feebleminded boy, Dickens (Brendan Fletcher), who has already gone through puberty. To quote one of three people who saw the film,49
Innocent and dangerous, Dickens is the most difficult character to reconcile. He’s twice Jeliza-Rose’s age but equals her mindset. The two eventually play husband and wife. These are the hardest situations to watch, as they would be innocent between two children and might also be with Dickens, but how can we be sure? Because we barely know Dickens or what he’s capable of, we don’t know what we’ll see next. An innocent kiss could turn into something unspeakable if allowed to go that far.50
Many men are feebleminded boys with big, powerful, unpredictable bodies; and women, meanwhile, remain about as fragile, physically, as little girls,—or else, we’re speaking too hastily. But the double standard we’re exploring in this post emerges, in part, because men are stronger and more violent than women. And this aggression in a man runs very close to his sexual impulse, particularly his jealousy. Once more, we turn to Roger Scruton:
[The man’s] jealousy has a peculiar focus. He is pained, not so much by the attempt by other men to help and support his woman, as by their attempt to unite with her sexually. Indeed, it is the thought of her copulating with another which causes him the greatest outrage.51
Now, although we don’t doubt the sincerity, integrity and ability of men—like Maher, McInnes, Rogan and others—who would, on the flip-side of the double standard, protect teenyboppers from (and exact retribution upon) lechers; and while we also concede outright that boys ostensibly take “this sort of child abuse stuff”52 better than girls;53 it’s nevertheless hard for us outsiders to look at straight men’s acute fixation on the innocence of little girls and not see—Oh, only faintly, only vaguely!—a parody of the same jealousy and outrage with which they covet sexual access to their girlfriends, wives, and mistresses.
And if a girl is unfortunately abused, the consequences for herself and others can be dire.
If you spend a little time going over stories of grown women who pursue boys, they start to blur together. Often, the woman was a victim of sexual abuse in her own childhood.54
What grinning straight males defend as a boon for a young boy is “often” the fruit of the same abuse they make such a noise about preventing and avenging. This is, obviously, another masculine secret into which our faggotry simply can’t penetrate.
Ergo, we’ll briefly take recourse to the insight of a lesbian. With a sharp eye, scholar and critic Camille Paglia has carefully assized the heterosexual psyche.
“The male has to will his sexual authority,” she writes, “before the woman who is a shadow of his mother and of all women.”55 In fact, “[h]eterosexual men are closer to women [than homosexual men],” or so Paglia once told super-hetero Charlie Rose, “because they’re in essence mating with the shadow of their mothers; the shadow of their mothers is falling over their wives.”56 Horny striplings getting laid by hot, damaged, easy MILFs is the acme of straight male fulfillment.— “Was he being taken advantage of? I wish I had been taken advantage of like that.”57
NY Mag explains the appeal further, from the boy’s perspective:
The older woman. Knowledgeable, seasoned, experienced. Hot! The fantasy creature who embodies full-blown female sexuality in all its mysterious glory. Of course, she’s out of reach; it will never happen. She inhabits her own complicated realm of emotions and responsibilities and lingerie, and you are just … a kid. But imagine the initiation! The possibilities! (Sexually, sure, but also for bragging.) It would be awesome.58
For their taboo relationships with teenage boys, female predators get fondled with kid gloves. Many of their own sex can be guaranteed to sentimentalize and even envy them as complicated, tortured, victimized lovers, desperately clinging to their unpopular personal truth. And to feel bigger, men will brush aside questionable liaisons between women and boys, especially if it nets the boy a good time, as a forgivable lapse of the inadequate willpower of the weaker vessel.
MILF-boy love and its popular advocacy short-circuits our typical contempt for wrongdoing to the letter of the law. As per usual, sex yet again rips up our social fictions—in this case legal egalitarianism. Very real sex differences clearly alter how predator-victim relations are assessed.
In our current spongy, liberal social order, we fags rely on blanket “legal egalitarianism” and its mythological basis59 to keep our place in society as harmless practitioners of an “alternative lifestyle,” rather than, as in days of yore, readily jailable criminals against nature. Acknowledging and affirming this double standard, as straight men freely do, undermines legal egalitarianism and, potentially, undermines us too. This is the disadvantage of our enrollment as gay men in “equality” politics.— Without legal egalitarianism, heteros would still have the hierarchical relationships of female/male, wife/husband, mother/father that serve, unspoken, as the foundation for the flimsy social machines that permit and facilitate experiments in “alternative lifestyles.”60 Without it, we homos would be equal to an equality that was no longer credible or enforceable.
Targeting and protesting the double standard that privileges MILF-boy love initiates another long-running liberal reform project, which will converge with other such projects in pursuit of the lowest common equality and finally insist on blanket permissiblity, a pale hedonism. This is the very descent down the “slippery slope” which our legal gains as open gays are said to accelerate.
With the blandest civic-mindedness, we do want to recommend that the predators of boys and girls, whether they are men or women, straight or gay, be handled the same way. However, in light of the above, there remains only one option left at hand pursuant to that justice.— And that’s to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with a strongman who will lump offenders altogether under a single umbrella, like the righteous Bro. Dillon Awes!
[P]eople say, “Well, what about all the straight people that molest children?” They’re fags. I don’t care what you call them. If a person is with a child, you’re a fag, you’re a reprobate, you’re a sodomite; I don’t care what kind of classifications our government wants to give them. All homosexuals are pedophiles.61
And needless to say, that line of reasoning doesn’t work out for us either.
Carlson et al., qtd. in Media Matters Staff, “Outnumbered's Tucker Carlson Sees Nothing Wrong With Female Teacher Sexually Harassing Male Student,” op. cit., at 00:02:00.
Virginia Woolf, “A Room of One’s Own” (originally published, Hogarth Press, 1929; reposted, Project Gutenberg Australia, Oct 2002). https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200791h.html
Jordan Peterson qtd. in Bite-sized Philosophy, “Jordan Peterson - Men Can’t Control Crazy Women” (YouTube, Oct 3, 2017). Click here.
Never underestimate with what quick reflexes Conservatives will take out their own, galvanized by the Left invoking a moral standard that they themselves do not observe in-house. We might take the Right’s complicity in Yiannopoulos’s downfall as a springboard for further research into the asymmetries of the Culture War, “how the Left’s show morality hijacks conscientiousness in Conservatives.”
Like Eve Ensler, Takei has similarly been allowed to revise the facts for palatability’s sake.
George Takei qtd. in Frank Rizzo, “George Takei’s Gay Trek of a Life” (Connecticut Voice, Feb 26, 2020). https://ctvoice.com/2020/02/26/george-takeis-gay-trek-of-a-life/
“One uncomfortable moment: Takei recounting his first homosexual encounter when he was seduced by a summer camp counselor at the age of 16. Uh, and how old was the other guy?” Guy Aoki, “INTO THE NEXT STAGE: Not Enough Depth in ‘To Be Takei’” (The Rafu Shimpo, Sep 4, 2014). https://rafu.com/2014/09/into-the-next-stage-not-enough-depth-in-to-be-takei/
Pᴀᴜʟ Pᴀʀᴋᴇʏ: Okay, okay, fine; I-I retract my statement, MILO. I retract my statement. I-I shan’t slander you further. But you are-you are advocating for cross-generational relationships here, can we-can we be honest about that?
Mɪʟᴏ: Yeah I don’t mind saying-I don’t mind admitting that…
Paul Parkey & Milo Yiannopoulos qtd. in a clip from The Drunken Peasants Podcast, EP. 193, as edited and reposted by The Reagan Battalion on Twitter, Feb 19, 2017. At 00:02:22.
How did Yiannopoulos respond to the moralizing against him? (Spoiler:) By upping the ante.
Milo Yiannopoulos, Dangerous (Dangerous Books, 2012) p. 10. (Kindel ed.)
We always wondered if this meant that a rules-for-thee-and-not-for-me god was free to bugger his angels. Even though that would be, at the very least, a variety doll-fucking if not a higher degree of incest than impregnating child-of-god-umpteenth-removed Mary.
“You remind me of a young, gay, alive Christopher Hitchens.” Bill Maher qtd. in “Milo Yiannopoulos,” Wikiquote, https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos
Maher qtd. in Jethro Nededog, “Bill Maher takes credit for conservative firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos' downfall: ‘You're welcome’” (Business Insider, Feb 22, 2017). https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-maher-milo-yiannopoulos-real-time-2017-2 Emphasis added.
“What I think people saw was an emotionally needy Ann Coulter wannabe trying to make a buck off of the left’s propensity for outrage,” Maher told The New York Times on Tuesday [Feb 21] of his interview with Yiannopoulos.
“And by the end of the weekend, by dinnertime Monday, he’s dropped as a speaker at CPAC,” he continued, referring to the Conservative Political Action Conference. “Then he’s dropped by Breitbart, and his book deal falls through. As I say, sunlight is the best disinfectant. You’re welcome.”
Bill Maher qtd. in Travis M. Andrews, “Bill Maher, who took credit for the downfall of Milo Yiannopoulos, has also defended adult sex with children” (The Washington Post, Feb 24, 2017). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/02/24/bill-maher-who-took-credit-for-the-downfall-of-milo-yiannopoulos-has-also-defended-adult-sex-with-children/
Bill Maher qtd. in Ibid. Emphasis added.
Which is still going since 1979, some forty-five years strong.
“If Milo were a liberal, he could say whatever and then some, and he wouldn’t be addressing CPAC, he would be emceeing the Oscars.” Rush Limbaugh qtd. in The Rush Limbaugh Show, “A Young Conservative Defends Milo” (RushLimbaugh.com, Feb 22, 2017). https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2017/02/22/a-young-conservative-defends-milo/
Thomas W. Krause, “Lafave Signs Plea” (Tampa Bay Tribune, Nov 23, 2005). https://web.archive.org/web/20051125021418/http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBL1FT6DGE.html Emphasis added.
[Judge] Stancil wrote [in his rejection order] that Marion prosecutors’ proposed plea, which would have given Lafave the same house arrest terms as the Hillsborough deal, “would undermine the credibility of the court, and the criminal justice system as a whole, and would erode public confidence in our schools.”
Shannon Colavecchio-Van Sickler & Abbie Van Sickler, “Lafave case ‘over for good’” (Tampa Bay Times, Mar 22, 2006). https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2006/03/22/lafave-case-over-for-good/
In Lafave’s case, charges were dismissed because the victim’s mother did not want to put her son through a trial that, given America’s current fascination with sexual abuse, was bound to become a staple of tabloid television.
“I’m his mom and I couldn't protect him when it came time to what she did to him. I can protect him now,” she told a Tampa television station. She said she was relieved her son would be spared from testifying. “Every word that came out of his mouth, every detail that was presented, would have been terrible for him.”
Suzanne Goldenberg, “Too pretty for prison” (The Guardian, Mar 23, 2006). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/mar/24/usa.gender
CNN, “Prosecutors drop sex case against teacher” (CNN, Mar 26, 2006). http://edition.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/21/charges.dropped/index.html
It’s worth further quoting from the article:
[Lavafe] said she was taking a journalism course online, adding, “God has given me a great outlet to write, and I would hope I could reach people through writing.”
“I am a strong Christian woman,” she said. “I believe that God has a path for me, and this was just a bump in the road.”
The judge had forced the state’s hand, prosecutors said.
“I’m not satisfied with the resolution, but I’m satisfied this is the only resolution that protected the victim,” said Ric Ridgway, chief assistant state attorney in Marion County.
Colavecchio-Van Sickler & Van Sickler, op. cit.
A factual, but no doubt trivial detail.
John Fitzgibbons qtd. in Goldenberg, op. cit.
We discovered that Bill was, at another time, according to his copious Emmy nominations, an executive producer of Vice for a time too. How do these media people land their gigs?
It’s nearly the same article that appears as the one in the Washington Post.— See: Ryan Parker, “Bill Maher Under Fire for 1998 Comments Condoning Sex Between 35-Year-Old Woman, 12-Year-Old Boy” (Hollywood Reporter, Feb 23, 2017). https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/bill-maher-under-fire-1998-comments-condoning-sex-between-35-year-old-woman-12-year-old-boy-979-979039/
Remember when the magic started, but it still seemed only safe to send our feelings through music and movie themes? Do you remember when I knew we needed each other each day, constantly, when ‘I love you’ was disguised so we could say it all day in front of everyone? All the love songs seem to have been written for us.
Allegedly a passage from one of Letourneau’s love notes to then approximately thirteen-year-old Vili Fualaau, her sixth-grade student; courtesy of the old Rotten.com entry on Letourneau, archived here.
At the centencing, [sic!] the court clerk announced, “The crime of rape of a child in the 2nd degree is classified as the most serious offense.”
As she pleaded guilty to child rape, LeTourneau appeared remorseful.
At the 1997 sentencing hearing, [Letourneau] said, “It was wrong, and I am sorry. I give you my word that it will not happen again.”
Though prosecutors wanted a seven-year sentence, the judge allowed LeTourneau to remain free as long as she stayed away from Vili.
The jugde [sic!!] said, “Whether you stay out of prison is completely within your hands!”
Olsen notes, “They released her, and of course the second she got out, she went back to him.”
The Seattle Times reported it on Feb. 5, 1998, with the following headline: “Police Find LeTourneau with Youth… Caught in Car at 3 a.m.”
The two were caught together, a scene re-enacted in a TV movie.
Once again, LeTourneau returned to court. Once again, she was pregnant [by the “child” she had “raped” as per the language of the “centencing”].
Tatiana Morales, “What's Next For LeTourneau?” (CBS News, Jul 30, 2004). https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-next-for-letourneau/
The name “Vili Fualaau” is almost as ridiculous as “Milo Yiannopoulos.”
Vili Fualaau, unlike Milo Yiannopoulos, was at no time shunned for promoting what happened to him as a good thing for others when he, as an adult, talked about his experience with Letourneau. There have been other adult men to do that for him, who envy him.
She’s a mother, pregnant again, and in prison! Oh, won’t somebody think of the children involved?
We would add that Letourneau ALREADY had FOUR children by her first husband, Steve Letourneau, all of whom overromantic Maher so glibly forgets! See Anna Quintana, “Mary Kay Letourneau’s ‘First Family’ Has Been Laying Low Since Her 1997 Scandal” (Distractify, Jul 8, 2020). https://www.distractify.com/p/mary-kay-letourneau-first-family Emphasis added.
To fill in still more details on this “unorthodox” American family:—
Mary Kay Letounreau was released from prison in 2004.
She eventually married Vili Fualaau in 2005 with whom she already had two daughters.
Fualaau later filed for separation in 2017, athough he quickly withdrew the filing.
In 2019, however, the couple did legally separate.
Mary Kary died in 2020.
Fualaau now has had a third child with another woman.
Bria McNeal, “May December: Where is Vili Fualaau Now?” (Esquire, Jan 4, 2024). https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a46040398/may-december-where-is-vili-fualaau-now/
Travis M. Andrews, “Bill Maher, who took credit for the downfall of Milo Yiannopoulos, has also defended adult sex with children” (The Washington Post, Feb 24, 2017). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/02/24/bill-maher-who-took-credit-for-the-downfall-of-milo-yiannopoulos-has-also-defended-adult-sex-with-children/ Emphasis added.
Especially compared to how much you can get out of them.
“Pegging.” Allegedly a term coined by fagtivist Dan Savage:—
Savage has focused a considerable chunk of his advice on straight people. He begged them to expand their repertoires beyond penis-in-vagina sex. “If straights could define ‘sex’ to include acts that don’t require penetration—frottage, mutual masturbation, non-penetrative oral sex (licking under, over and around)—you’d get laid more,” he wrote in an answer in the 1998 book. His promotion of pegging—the term he coined in 2001 to describe sex where a woman penetrates a man using a strap-on—stems from a strident desire to see straight people level the playing field when it comes to penetration.
L.V. Anderson, “Dan Savage Revolutionized Sex. Then the Revolution Came for Him.” (Slate, Sept 23, 2021). https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/09/dan-savage-advice-savage-love-criticism-interview.html
Sodomy laws excepted, of course.—
Andrew Chow, Esq., “Men Can be Legally Raped: New FBI Definition” (FindLaw.com, last updated Mar 21, 2019). https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/men-can-be-legally-raped-new-fbi-definition/ (Pesky liberals! Not being raped used to be one of the good things about being a guy!)
In honor of whom a café is named in Hungary.
Roger Scruton, “Man and Woman,” Sexual Desire (Phoenix, Orion Books, Ltd., London, 1994) pp. 262-63.
Ibid.
Not a good fit for the phenomenon. Our vernacular balks at this clearly prevalent archetype. Honeypit? Puppy sucker? Mommy slut?
Ariel Levy, “Dirty Old Women” (New York Magazine, May 18, 2006). https://nymag.com/news/features/17064/index1.html
Ibid.
Another factual, but no doubt trivial detail.
Judy Kuriansky qtd. in Ibid.
Rogan & McInnes qtd. in JRE Clips, “Joe Rogan and Gavin McInnes discuss the Milo Yiannopoulos Pedophilia Controversy” (YouTube, Feb 23, 2017). At 00:15:42.
And we’re the other two.
Brian Eggert, “Tideland (Review)” (Deep Focus Reviews, Mar 6, 2007). https://www.deepfocusreview.com/reviews/tideland/
Roger Scruton, op. cit., p. 263.
Mɪʟᴏ: This is a controversial point of view, I accept; but we get hung up on this kind of, you know, this sort of “child abuse” stuff. And to the point we’re, you know, heavily policing even relationships between consenting adults,—you know, sort of grad students and professors at universities.
Milo Yiannopoulos qtd. in a clip from The Drunken Peasants Podcast, EP. 193, as edited and reposted by The Reagan Battalion on Twitter, Feb 19, 2017. At 00:00:00.
In 1998, Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch, and Robert Bauserman (professors at Temple University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Michigan, respectively) published a study that has resounded through the psychological Establishment ever since. The article, published in the American Psychological Association’s Psychological Bulletin, was what’s known as a meta-analysis, an overview of the existing science, in this case on the long-term effects of childhood sexual abuse. The authors concluded that “negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense” and that men who’d been abused “reacted much less negatively than women.”
Levy, op. cit.
Ibid.
Camille Paglia, “Sex and Violence, or Nature and Art,” Sexual Personae Art And Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (Vintage Books, New York, 1990). p. 37.
Paglia qtd. in Charlie Rose, “Women in Congress; Michael Kovnat; Camille Paglia” (PBS, air date Sept 16, 1992). Uploaded to YouTube, Aug 12, 2018. At 00:11:00.
Bill Maher qtd. in Andrews, op. cit. Emphasis added.
Levy, op. cit.
Moreover, there is a simple explanation for the reason that so many people believe in human neurological uniformity (HNU). It is a core doctrine of Christianity. Even more precisely, it is a core doctrine of the neo-primitive Christianity that we call Protestantism. And specifically, I believe it to be a mutated and metastasized version of the Quaker doctrine of the Inner Light. Basically, all humans must be neurologically uniform because we all have the same little piece of God inside us. (All the American Protestant sects, or at least all the Northern ones, became heavily Quakerized during the 19th century. But that’s a different discussion.)
Curtis Yarvin, “Chapter 9: How to Uninstall a Cathedral,” An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives (Unqualified Reservations, Jun 12, 2008). https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2008/06/ol9-how-to-uninstall-cathedral/
That’s not to posit that heterosexuality is ultimate or fundamental, merely that it serves as the current basis of our shared institutions and statuses to which we, as homosexuals, are merely appended as “equals.”
Dillon Awes qtd. in Caelan Conrad, “What is a Groomer?” (YouTube, Nov 3, 2022). At 00:34:02. (For the full-length version of Bro. Awes’s June 5, 2022 sermon, “Why We Won’t Shut Up,” click here.) Emphasis Awes’s.